Listen to this articleIn this article I will stick to mainstream information sources to describe the vaccine. I’m doing this because that information is damning enough. But of course, the mainstream information is likely not telling the whole story. What is more likely is that the genetic nanoparticle injections are delivering much more than is advertised. And these mRNA ‘vaccines’ are only just starting. In the coming years they will be used in a variety of ways to increase our intake and accumulation of nano-tech. Which is a ‘tell’ that this is not just about COVID, it’s about a transhuman future where the mRNA ‘vaccine’ is an introductory and primary vector to move us in that direction.
As I write this in early January 2021, the Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines have just started to roll out to front-line healthcare workers and the elderly in long-term care facilities. Major media covers the latest on these vaccine roll outs breathlessly and ad nauseum. They endlessly repeat the ‘safe and effective’ mantra, desperately trying to convince the significant number of ‘vaccine hesitant’ audiences to trust and accept it. An endless parade of various notables, officials and role models are put on display getting the shot.
Back in April when I wrote Why I won’t be taking the vaccine, assuming I will have a choice, I had barely heard of the mRNA vaccine, but now the term is everywhere. All that I said then is still valid, but that was based on my knowledge of ‘conventional’ vaccines (MMR, DTaP, Hib, etc). I assumed that the COVID-19 vaccine would be a similar formulation, and use a similar vaccine technology — basically the introduction of a weakened or dead virus to stimulate the immune system.
Well, I assumed wrong — big time!
Let’s take a step back and look at what these new vaccines actually do.
The mRNA vaccines — both Moderna and Pfizer at this time[1] — use a completely different, novel and much more sophisticated technology. This to the point that they actually do not qualify as vaccines at all. The mRNA vaccines do not contain a virus or a virus particle, alive or dead. Rather, they contain synthesized mRNA molecules, that is, messenger ribonucleic acid. They put those pieces of mRNA inside engineered lipid (fat-based) nanoparticles.
The mRNA ‘vaccine’ is NOT a vaccine in any sense of the word. Rather, it is an engineered device designed to defeat and then breach the innate defenses of the cell membrane so that it can enter the cell’s cytoplasm — the inner world of the cell. There it is further designed to hook up with a ribosome that then reads the ‘code’ of the RNA to produce the ‘spike’ protein and grow it like an alien head on the cell membrane’s surface. The presence of this alien spike protein is finally supposed to signal our immune system and stimulate the production of antibodies that will then foul and clog up and prevent the SARS-CoV-2 virus from attaching to and infecting our cells and giving us COVID-19.
Or we can put it like this:
1 Lipid nanoparticles injected >
2 nanoparticles stick to your cells >
3 nanoparticles trick, defeat and then pry open the cell membrane >
4 mRNA emerges from the nanoparticle >
5 synthesized mRNA molecules enter the cell >
6 mRNA molecules hook up with ribosomes >
7 ribosome translates the mRNA code >
8 ribosome produces the peptide which folds into the spike protein >
9 the spike protein attaches to the cell membrane >
10 the presence of the spike protein stimulates the immune system >
11 the immune system produces antibodies >
12 the antibodies prevent SARS-CoV-2 viruses from attaching to and infecting your other cells.
That’s quite a cascade! What could possibly go wrong?!
The difference between the mRNA ‘vaccines’ and traditional vaccines is that the mRNA vaccines are engineered nanoparticles designed to ‘smuggle’ the mRNA molecule inside the cell itself. It’s designed to defeat the cell’s innate defenses. Traditional vaccines do not do that.
There’s something very strange and even sinister about this ‘device,’ about a device designed to trick and then defeat and invade our cells.
In a previous life I was an engineer and I so know a few things about its practice. I know that engineers design products as an extension of their own intent and ability, and their products even represent their attitude to accomplish their desired goal.
For example, right now as I sit at my desk, every man-made article within my reach was designed and engineered: my coffee cup, the coffee in the cup, the paper that I’m writing on, the Cross pen that I write with, the printed books on my desk, the desk, the floor that holds up the desk, the house foundation that holds up the floor that holds up the desk. . . . You get the idea. The fact is that every man-made thing first had to be designed by human beings and those things themselves convey the designer’s intent.
The mRNA ‘vaccine’ was also designed and carries the engineer’s intent and assumptions. I say all that because the reasons I state below for refusing these engineered devices, revolve around human attributes. It may sound strange to attribute human characteristics to a device but a novel device such as this can have those attributes because it’s an extension of the engineers, technicians, and administrators who designed, managed and built them.
So here are four more reasons I will not take the ‘vaccine:’[2]
1 It is deceptive
Both the Moderna and Pfizer ‘vaccines’ are deceptive in at least three ways.[3]
A The vaccine is misnamed. As I’ve said already, this is NOT a vaccine; it is an engineered nanotechnology device. Yes, it outwardly looks like a vaccine and the official agencies call it a vaccine, and yes, it’s ultimately designed to trigger an immune response, but it works so fundamentally different, we should call it something else. At least, let’s call it a nano-tech vaccine.
B The design intent is to ‘trick’ the cell’s defenses. This may get a little technical, but stay with me. Every one of your 30 trillion or-so cells[4] (yes, that’s trillion with a ‘T’) has a perimeter called the cell membrane. This membrane is designed – obviously by God – to keep its cell components IN and any intruders who don’t belong OUT. It performs this security in surprisingly sophisticated ways that Moderna and Pfizer have worked very long and hard to defeat. All so that they can ‘safely’ but surreptitiously smuggle their mRNA molecule in.
C The way this trick is performed is both fundamentally deceptive and revealing. The extent to which the chemical and biological engineers have gone is stunning.
The way to explain this simply is that some of the naturally-occurring mRNA molecule ‘ladder rungs’ have been replaced with other synthesized, man-made ‘ladder rungs.’ The ladder rungs of the DNA and RNA molecules, in nearly all living things, recur in just four compounds:
- adenine (A)
- cytosine (C)
- guanine (G)
- uracil (U)
But in the modified-nucleoside messenger RNA, the engineers have replaced uracil with ‘pseudouridine’ and they’ve replaced cytosine with 5-methylcytosine, both synthesized, not naturally-occurring human molecules.
The purpose for modifying these nucleosides is to try to ‘trick’ or deceive the cell’s natural defenses in order to open up a hole or pore in the membrane to gain entry to the cell. Smuggling foreign RNA is ‘tricky’ because you have to bypass cellular ‘systems’ that prevent penetration and translation of foreign mRNA. The two most formidable barriers to entering the cell are:
- ribonucleases (RNAses) – break down the normally transient mRNA molecules
- toll-like receptors, TLR 7 and TLR 8 – intracellular barriers or ‘tolls’
This trick is revealing because it speaks to the extent to which the designers were forced to and yet were willing to go to defeat the cells’ natural defenses. But it also speaks to the built-in integrity and power of each cell to preserve the integrity of the unique individual. Each cell holds one copy of a unique-to-the-individual DNA molecule, three billion base pairs long, and coiled inside twenty-three pairs of chromosomes, and those all safely snugged inside each nucleus of the thirty trillion cells. Truly an awesome phenomenon, whose workings the body quietly and effortlessly maintains.
2 It is arrogant, presumptuous, disrespectful and insulting
This is obviously a catch-all reason, but there is an attitude here whose depth is hard to describe. I’ve just explained the extent that Moderna and Pfizer have gone to deceive. But behind that deceit is a hubris that is truly stunning.
They’ve replaced two of the four nucleosides with their own synthesized nucleosides, essentially constructing an artificial RNA molecule. Perhaps here are a few of their thoughts, if I can try to recreate them:
‘we can do this!’
‘we can make an equivalent nucleoside’
‘we can do this and, though it may create a negative reaction in some and some will be injured and some will die, yet we can sacrifice “a few lives” for “the greater good” and for “population health.”’
The hubris of this engineered device is off the charts. To presume to enter the sacred world of the cell, hacking about with intent to protect and to heal, is astounding. The engineered device is massively arrogant, posing to out-engineer the body’s innate immune systems, which are a thousand times more complex and integrated into the entire body.
Yes, on the one hand, the mRNA vaccine is an engineering marvel, an amazing achievement of science. But on the other hand, it amounts to – by comparison – nothing more than a cheap and primitive hack trying to ‘hack in’ to the cell. To accept this engineering device, is an insult and a betrayal of the body’s natural, innate, and gloriously-designed immune system, which of course, was designed by none other than God himself.
3 It is reckless and violent
I marvel at the complexity of our DNA and the body’s integrity. For example, science is still uncovering the mysteries of how cell division ensures a copy of the entire genome is made every time a cell divides. And this cell division, perfect timing, amount, rate, etc, of the thirty trillion or so cells, goes on constantly throughout our lives.
Truly mind-boggling.
Science is still discovering the mysteries of how this happens and how rarely things go wrong. For example, cell biologists have recently deciphered the signal that ensures no chromosome is left behind during cell division. Here’s a portion of the phys.org article that describes that:
Starting as a single cell, organisms undergo millions of generations of divisions to ultimately generate the bones, heart, brain and other components that make up a living being. The mainspring within this intricate process is the transfer of DNA through each subsequent cell split within discrete packets called chromosomes.
It’s critical that all chromosomes are duplicated and precisely distributed through every generation of cell division. If the inherited chromosome components are altered, even slightly, birth defects and certain cancers can result.
A new study published in the journal Science by postdoctoral scholar Pablo Lara-Gonzalez, Division of Biological Sciences Professor Arshad Desai and their colleagues addresses the mystery of how chromosomes are inherited correctly every time a cell divides. Using a novel probe that monitors a key aspect of this process, Lara-Gonzalez and Desai have detailed the mechanics behind a “wait” signal that ensures that cell division isn’t prematurely set in motion.[5]
But where does this ‘wait’ signal come from? And when does it ‘know’ it should no longer be generated? And how does the cell interpret this? This discovery answers some questions, but opens up many others. Now, multiply mysteries like this one by the hundreds or thousands, of which science does not know and may never know. My point is that the body is an endless well of mysteries, and to presume that we know enough to break into the cell itself, is truly reckless and even violent.
This recklessness reveals Moderna and Pfizer’s and, for that matter, most of modern science’s presumption. It’s the ultimate presumption that the body is a complex system of systems that, if we can simply deconstruct it all, we can then re-engineer it and control it. But it cannot be reduced to a ‘system’ at all, and neither can the immune ‘subsystem.’
The FDA and Operation Warp Speed is also part of the recklessness and violence. Most people don’t realize that (and this is not a political statement — I do not support Trump or Biden), both the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines are not approved or licensed by the FDA. They are only authorized for emergency use.[6] And lest you think this is quibbling over semantics, here is the language directly from the FDA authorization letter:
All descriptive printed matter, advertising, and promotional material relating to the use of the Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine clearly and conspicuously shall state that:
• This product has not been approved or licensed by FDA, but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA, under an EUA to prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) for use in individuals 18 years of age and older;
and
The vaccine contains a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 formulated in lipid particles. It is an investigational vaccine not licensed for any indication.
Let’s do a little number crunching with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)[7] data and the query engine into that data, provided by the National Vaccine Information Center.[8] The VAERS reporting system is Health and Human Services’ self-reporting passive surveillance system and is notoriously underreported. Many people simply do not know about it or fail to report their ‘adverse event.’
A 2010 federal study found that “fewer than 1% of adverse events are reported.”[9] We should then conservatively extrapolate the numbers below, at least by a factor of ten.
Here are the raw data as of January 7, 2021 from VAERS, the latest, to date, that HHS is reporting for the COVID-19 vaccines:
| Cases of adverse events within one day of vaccine | Cases of adverse events within two days or more | Total | |
| Moderna | 524 | 545 | 1069 |
| Pfizer | 2511 | 2808 | 5319 |
| TOTAL | 3035 | 3353 | 6388 |
Breaking down the vaccine adverse events further:
| Life threatening | Hosp-italizations | Died | Office visits | ER or doctor visit | Disabled | |
| Moderna | 67 | 67 | 29 | 138 | 221 | 7 |
| Pfizer | 27 | 145 | 27 | 688 | 1129 | 17 |
| Totals | 94 | 212 | 56 | 816 | 1350 | 24 |
And extrapolating based on the admitted underreporting of the VAERS system, let’s say the numbers conservatively represent, not one percent, but ten percent of the actual adverse events. That means that we would multiply all the numbers by a factor of ten,[10] giving us a total of 63,880 cases as of January 7, 2021.
Then, also as of January 7, 2021, approximately 1.79 million[11] doses of vaccine had been given in the United States. That means that — again conservatively — 3.6% of those who receive the vaccine, have an adverse event following the first shot; which means that, you will likely have a three to four percent chance, at least, of having an adverse reaction. That adverse reaction could result in a doctor’s visit, hospitalization, disability or even death.
Further extrapolating, once the entire population of 263 million 16 and over[12] adults receive this vaccine, at a 3.6% adverse event rate, that would mean that 9.5 million people would have an adverse reaction!
Now, Is that an acceptable risk? Does that sound ethical to you? Or does it sound quite reckless?
Recklessness is knowing you’re probably going to get hurt or cause someone else’s hurt, yet going ahead and doing it anyway. That is precisely what Moderna and Pfizer and the FDA are doing.
Whereas recklessness is unintentional or indirect harm, violence is intentionally causing harm. And the FDA, Moderna and Pfizer are complicit there too, although it’s more difficult to prove. But I would argue that there’s mild recklessness and then there’s off-the-charts recklessness. Moderna and Pfizer are at least off-the-charts reckless, and we should be asking, ‘why?’
4 It is perverse and monstrous
As if it’s not enough that these ‘vaccines’ are deceptive, arrogant and reckless, I have to say the most disturbing thing is that, overall, they are perverse and even monstrous, literally monstrous.
How?
A They artificially grow ‘spike’ proteins. At first I couldn’t understand all the language around spike proteins. But then it finally dawned on me what they were talking about. They were literally designing, engineering, genetically manipulating, duplicating and synthesizing the coronavirus ‘spike’ — the little red knobs on the virus graphic that we’ve all seen. Yeah, that spike. They genetically grow that spike on a muscle cell, or other cells using the RNA device to code for the production of this protein.
My ‘ick sense’ needle just pegged. Really?!
Yes, that’s what the Moderna and Pfizer ‘vaccine’ claims to do. It grows spikes on your cells. Monstrosities.
B The nucleosides pseudouridine and 5-methylcytosine are unnatural. These fake nucleosides, which are constructed at the fundamental genetic level, are the way that Moderna and Pfizer hack into your cells. There is something warped and perverse about that.
C The mRNA molecule is encapsulated in a liposome — a lipid (fat) nanoparticle. You may ask: ‘why nanoparticles?’ One important reason is that these nanoparticles mimic our cells. They are scaled to that size because they need to be at the same basic size as our cells. They amount to ‘fake cells’ that glom onto our real cells and then try to ‘blend in.’ Yes, this goes back to the deception point, but it’s more than that. This is perversity. These lipid nanoparticles act in concert as a swarm to invade our cells. Beyond creepy!
Conclusion
So even though the pressure to trust and accept the vaccine is very high, and the social and political risks for not accepting it are even higher, this is nevertheless, for me, an easy decision to make. How can I possibly trust a vaccine that is this deceptive, arrogant, reckless and monstrous? It simply is beyond the pale.
NO!
My trust is in the living God who made the heavens and the earth and our awesome immune ‘systems.’
[1] Both the Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca vaccines are sure to follow soon.
[2] The original article also has four reasons: Why I won’t be taking the vaccine, assuming I will have a choice.
[3] Again I’m tempted to go into the evidence that these nanoparticle ‘vaccines’ are much more than advertised, perhaps even a ‘Trojan Horse,’ but I’ll leave that for another article.
[4] No one knows precisely how many cells are in a human body, not even to the nearest trillion. Truly a mind-boggling thought!
[5] https://phys.org/news/2021-01-cell-biologists-decipher-chromosome-left.html captured on 12 January 2021.
[6] The FDA authorized the Moderna vaccine with no less than 26 conditions. Read it here: https://www.fda.gov/media/144636/download. At least, here in January 2021, the FDA has not yet licensed it, but it’s likely to gain licensure in the near future.
[7] See https://vaers.hhs.gov/
[8] See https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php
[9] A 2011 federally-funded study reported that: “Adverse events from drugs and vaccines are common, but underreported. Although 25% of ambulatory patients experience an adverse drug event, less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events and 1-13% of serious events are reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Likewise, fewer than 1% of vaccine adverse events are reported.” https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf, Captured on 19 January 2021.
[10] If the VAERS system really does represent less than one percent of the actual events, we would of course multiply by 100, not 10. Multiplying by 10 gives us a more conservative number. But even these conservative numbers are alarming.
English
Arabic
French
Russian
Spanish
Swahili